Previous Entry | Next Entry

Fall issue of Helix to be the last one

  • Sep. 14th, 2008 at 8:12 PM
Reading
William Sanders reports in his newsgroup that the upcoming issue of Helix will be their last, and has been planned to be their last for quite some time now:

http://webnews.sff.net/read?cmd=read&group=sff.people.sanders&artnum=86316

I can vouch for the fact that they'd made these plans months before the kerfuffle.* In fact, knowing that made it more difficult for me to decide how to respond to the aforementioned kerfuffle. Saying that I'd never submit to them again would have been a hollow threat, because I knew that I'd never have another chance to send them a story anyway. And I wasn't sure that a boycott would have any effect on a magazine that was on its last two issues.

But there you have it. The news is out, and I will gladly vouch for them when they say that the kerfuffle didn't have anything to do with them closing their doors.

(*I learned about it either at the end of 2007 or the beginning of 2008 -- they accepted my last story on 1/31/08, and I'd already known the news for at least a few weeks by that point.)

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]horace_hamster wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:30 am (UTC)
Your graciousness in the face of Mr Sanders' far-from-gracious comments about you and Beth B is commendable.
[info]jenwrites wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:34 am (UTC)
I'm a fan of people judging others on the truth and not on lies told to make one side or the other feel better (can you tell the U.S. is in the middle of a contentious election cycle right now?).
[info]icecreamempress wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 06:26 pm (UTC)
I think maybe [info]horace_hamster was referring to the far-from-gracious comments Sanders was making in the actual post to which you linked. "Stupid Righteous Girls," for instance.
[info]jenwrites wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 06:35 pm (UTC)
Oh, I know what's on the other end of the link. And yet, I'm still going to speak the truth on this one, because no good comes of people not having all the facts in a contentious arena.
[info]prusik wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:34 am (UTC)
It's always bad to see a market die. In this case, it's a market that I'm ineligible for, but that really is besides the point.

It is a rather odd sign off message though. One would almost think he was writing about himself.
[info]jenwrites wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:37 am (UTC)
Sanders is what you call "a character," if you hadn't already guessed that by now. He's never put on an editor's voice for Helix -- he's done everything in his own voice and on his own terms.
[info]metahacker wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:44 am (UTC)
His comments to [info]yhlee did not endear him to me in any way. (GRRRRRR.)
[info]time_shark wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 01:18 am (UTC)
I actually see those comments as a much more harmful screw-up than the original letter.
[info]fjm wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 07:28 am (UTC)
Agreed. They sent me searching for other stuff, by the end of which I was no longer willing to see that first letter as "ambivalent".
[info]jenwrites wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 02:56 am (UTC)
I might not have joined the Transcriptase gang were it not for his words to Yoon and to Nora. Still, I want to make sure the truth is out there about this particular development.
[info]time_shark wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:50 am (UTC)
I can also vouch that this was in the works pre-kerfuffle.
[info]beth_bernobich wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 12:52 am (UTC)
I can vouch for it, too.
[info]samhenderson wrote:
Sep. 15th, 2008 01:33 am (UTC)
Me as well.
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Terri McAllister